Free Shipping On world wide
- HOME
- PRODUCTS
- IN THE NEWS
- CONTACT US
- WEB SPECTRUM VIEWER ACCESS
-
English
-
USD
Free Shipping On world wide
On July 11, 2019, the FCC released a report and order that provided a pathway to commercial ownership of the 2.5GHz Educational Broadcast Service (EBS) channels that were previously reserved for educational groups. In this post, I am going to examine the progress that T-Mobile has made in shifting from leasing this spectrum to owning it.
We will be looking at two trends, using historical data from Spektrum Metric's Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool. The Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool is updated monthly and provides historical analysis going back to 2014.
Looking at our Spectrum Ownership Grid in the Web Spectrum Viewer, T-Mobile's control of the EBS spectrum is clearly seen. This is our Spectrum Grid displaying "Future" data which includes spectrum that T-Mobile leases or has a pending transaction filed.
Spectrum Grid - Future:
Shifting to the Spectrum Ownership Grid to display the spectrum licensee "FCC" reveals the licenses that T-Mobile actually owns. All of the white cells are educational licenses that likely lease their spectrum to T-Mobile.
Spectrum Grid - FCC:
National Weighted Spectrum Depth Trend:
The spectrum available in the EBS and BRS (Broadband Radio Service) bands for each county totals 194 MHz. If T-Mobile controlled every license in every county their National Population Weighted Average spectrum depth in the 2.5 GHz band would be 194 MHz, thus any amount of below 194 MHz represents another licensees ownership or lease of spectrum in these bands.
After the EBS Auction was completed, T-Mobile's total 2.5 GHz spectrum (orange line) rose from roughly 164 MHz to 180 MHz, indicating that about 14 MHz of Nationally Weighted Spectrum is controlled by other carriers and licensees. The spike in September 2022 indicates the release of the auction results.
Over the same time period we quantified the spectrum that was directly owned by T-mobile (blue line). Note: The EBS Auction results are not reflected in this trend line because T-Mobile has not received direct ownership of the licenses. In the December 2010 to June 2023 timeframe, T-Mobile increased their ownership of the EBS spectrum by 11 MHz (National Weighted Population Spectrum Depth).
Previously we have written about the CBRS Consent Decree between the FCC and SAL Spectrum, Cable One, NorthWestern Corporation, US Cellular Corporation, and Shenandoah Cable Television. Each of these CBRS auction winners had an investment from Black Rock, Inc greater than 10% interest. Below are charts that reflecting each carrier's auction winnings, the licenses that they requested following the consent decree, and changes to each carriers market assignments.
Looking at the Combined Blackrock from the Auction Results table, there are many markets where the combined group has auction spectrum allotments of 60MHz. In the Updated License table, many markets went from being above the 40MHz limit to being below the 40MHz limit. This is primarily due to SAL Spectrum (ATNI) declining any spectrum assignments in virtually all of these markets.
The last column to highlight is the GAA Increase column in the Change table. This column reflects the net increase in GAA available spectrum in each market since the FCC is not planning to reauction this spectrum since it can still be utilized through the GAA usage process.
Arkansas and Illinois:
Missouri:
Maryland, Montana, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin:
On Friday, the FCC posted the results from Auction 110. On Saturday we updated the January 2021 release of our Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool to reflect the auction results. These results provide the most detailed view of each carrier's spectrum that can be deployed for 5G, particularly all of the available upper mid-band spectrum including EBS/BRS, 3.45GHz, CBRS, and C-band.
In the Spectrum Grid, we can see the channel allocations. In general, Dish took the upper end of the band with T-Mobile and AT&T alternate having the lower parts of the band. In many markets, AT&T is pinned in the middle of the band between T-Mobile, Grain, and Columbia Capital. Each of the spectrum investors has selected spectrum assignments adjacent to AT&T's spectrum meaning they are each well positioned to sell to AT&T if the 3.45GHz spectrum cap is lifted.
In the National Band Ownership slides we look at each carrier's ownership based upon the percent of MHz-POPs that they control.
For the 3.45GHz band, AT&T leads the way with 39% of the MHz-POPs, Dish has 30%, T-Mobile has 12%, and USCellular has 4%.
Looking the the complete picture for Upper Mid-band spectrum, T-Mobile still leads with 34%, Verizon follows with 30%, then AT&T with 24%. Dish has 9% of the upper mid-band MHz-POPs and USCellular has 2%.
In our December month-end review of open FCC transactions, we saw significant progress from the FCC in the processing the EBS tribal applications. 56 of the pending transactions were granted, reducing the remaining pending applications to 40.
FCC Tribal Application Status
|
Status
|
5/5/2021
|
10/31/2021
|
12/31/2021
|
|
Granted
|
201
|
273
|
329
|
|
Pending
|
175
|
94
|
40
|
|
Inactive/Withdrawn
|
7
|
5
|
|
|
Dismissed
|
18
|
20
|
20
|
|
Total
|
394
|
394
|
394
|
In our most recent blog post, we highlighted the challenges faced by T-Mobile in two markets where they don't control parts of the EBS spectrum (channels), that limit their deployment of large 5G channels across each urban market. Where that post focused on the effects of owning or not owning a specific channel across a geography, the EBS Spectrum Control Maps below provide a more general look at the percent of EBS spectrum that T-Mobile owns, the FCC owns, and Other Carriers own. To complete this analysis we used the MHz-POPs analysis from our EBS Auction Tool, combined with our analysis of T-Mobile's EBS MHz-POPs using the same geographic licensing database.
While these maps provide insights on the EBS band in totality, the individual issues faced by T-Mobile in Orange County, CA don't strongly appear in these maps because they control all of the EBS channels except the G channels meaning they still control a high percentage of the EBS spectrum in Orange County. For the Chicago market, the whitespace EBS challenges can be seen with Lake County receiving a light green and McHenry receiving an orange.
Today was the cutoff for comments on the EBS Whitespace Auction procedures, so let's take a look at the current status of the EBS Tribal applications, which have a priority on claiming EBS white space. From the chart below, 44% of the applications are still in process. Most concerning are the 83 applications that have been filed but have not seen any action by the FCC. Typically applications are moved to a pending status within a few weeks but these applications have been on file since 3Q - 2020.
| Tribal Applications | Status |
| Filed | 394 |
| Granted | 201 |
| Pending | 92 |
| Dismissed | 18 |
| No Action | 83 |
Below is a map of the granted tribal boundaries overlaid with the EBS A1 channel license areas. Each of these tribal applications has requested access to the first EBS auction channel (49.5MHz). Any tribal areas that extend into these license areas will not have access to the A1 channel (5.5MHz) in the overlap area.
Last year we provided an FCC Spectrum Screen Analysis reflecting the effects of the EBS reconfiguration, the CBRS allocation, and the C-band allocation. Two weeks ago the FCC has revised the Sub-6 GHz spectrum screen through their 3.45GHz rulemaking.
In the chart below we reflect the spectrum depth allotments that are included in our Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool. The links under in the frequency column will open the FCC spectrum screen documents and the comment field indicates the paragraphs where the spectrum screen is discussed.
The Allnet Spectrum Depth column indicates the spectrum allocations that we use in all of our typical spectrum depth reporting (county, CMA, PEA, State, and National). The FCC / Allnet Spectrum Screen allocations reflect the allocations that we use in our County, CMA market, and PEA Market Spectrum Screen columns.
| Band | Frequency | Allnet Spectrum Depth | FCC / Allnet Spectrum Screen | Comments |
| Low Band | 600 MHz | 70 | 70 | |
| Low Band | 700 MHz | 90 | 70 | First Net Spectrum not included |
| Low Band | Cellular | 50 | 50 | |
| Low Band | SMR | 14 | 14 | |
| Lw Mid Band | PCS | 140 | 140 | Includes H-block |
| Lw Mid Band | AWS-1 | 90 | 90 | |
| Lw Mid Band | AWS-3 | 65 | 65 | |
| Lw Mid Band | AWS-4 | 40 | 40 | |
| Up Mid Band | WCS | 30 | 20 | |
| Up Mid Band | BRS | 77.5 | 67.5 | BRS1 and BRS K guard bands not included |
| Up Mid Band | EBS | 116.5 | 116.5 | Paragraph 98-100 |
| Up Mid Band | 3.45GHz | 100 | 100 | Paragraph 101 |
| Up Mid Band | CBRS | 0 | 0 | Paragraph 107 |
| Up Mid Band | C-Band | 280 | 280 | Paragraph 83 |
| Total MHz | 1163 | 1123 |
To determine the overall Spectrum Screen value, the FCC divides the spectrum screen allotment (1123) by 3 and rounds to the nearest 10MHz. This makes the new spectrum screen including the 100MHz of 3.45GHz spectrum, 370 MHz.
In the Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool we have three views into the Spectrum Screen. They are a County Analysis View, a Cellular Market Area (CMA) View, and a Partial Economic Area (PEA) View.
County Analysis View:
In this view, each of the national carriers spectrum screen values are displayed along with the amount of spectrum in that county controlled by the FCC. The FCC value predominately represents the 3.45GHz spectrum allocation, but there is some EBS spectrum (whitespace) that is also allocated to the FCC.
PEA Market Analysis View:
The FCC announced the final rules for the new 3.45GHz band on March 19, 2021. With our April 2021 release, we updated our Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool to include the 3.45GHz frequency band in each of the analysis modules. The 10 - 10MHz channels appear in our Spectrum Grid as a part of NR Band 77. In the image below, we highlight the FCC's ownership of each of the channels (pre-auction) by county.
Honolulu County has a NA (Not Available) code for both the 3.45GHz spectrum and the C-band spectrum since neither band in available in Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. Looking at the National Band Ownership Charts, we can see that this unavailability affects 2% of the MHz-POPs or 2% of the US Population (~6.6M).
In the County Analysis Module the spectrum depth values for eight selected carriers are displayed. This image highlights each carriers 3.45GHz, CBRS, and C-band holdings.
Below is a more detailed description of our Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tools and the analysis capabilities it supports.
| Attachment A | |||||||||||
| Auction 108 License Inventory Subject to the Results of the Rural Tribal Priority Window | |||||||||||
| Proposed Bidding Units, Upfront Payments, and Minimum Bids | |||||||||||
| State/ Territory |
County Name | FIPS Code |
Channel | Item ID | Band- width |
MEA | Population (2010) |
Subject to Small Market Cap | Bidding Units |
Upfront Payment |
Minimum Bid |
| AL | Autauga | 1001 | 1 | AL-001-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 54,571 | Yes | 80 | $8,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Autauga | 1001 | 2 | AL-001-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 54,571 | Yes | 80 | $8,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Autauga | 1001 | 3 | AL-001-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 54,571 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $5,000 |
| AL | Baldwin | 1003 | 1 | AL-003-1 | 49.5 | 27 | 182,265 | No | 200 | $20,000 | $50,000 |
| AL | Baldwin | 1003 | 2 | AL-003-2 | 50.5 | 27 | 182,265 | No | 200 | $20,000 | $50,000 |
| AL | Baldwin | 1003 | 3 | AL-003-3 | 16.5 | 27 | 182,265 | No | 90 | $9,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Barbour | 1005 | 1 | AL-005-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 27,457 | Yes | 40 | $4,000 | $8,000 |
| AL | Barbour | 1005 | 2 | AL-005-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 27,457 | Yes | 40 | $4,000 | $8,000 |
| AL | Barbour | 1005 | 3 | AL-005-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 27,457 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $2,000 |
| AL | Bibb | 1007 | 1 | AL-007-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 22,915 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $6,000 |
| AL | Bibb | 1007 | 2 | AL-007-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 22,915 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $6,000 |
| AL | Bibb | 1007 | 3 | AL-007-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 22,915 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $2,000 |
| AL | Blount | 1009 | 1 | AL-009-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 57,322 | Yes | 80 | $8,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Blount | 1009 | 2 | AL-009-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 57,322 | Yes | 80 | $8,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Blount | 1009 | 3 | AL-009-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 57,322 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $5,000 |
| AL | Bullock | 1011 | 1 | AL-011-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 10,914 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Bullock | 1011 | 2 | AL-011-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 10,914 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Bullock | 1011 | 3 | AL-011-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 10,914 | Yes | 5 | $500 | $1,000 |
| AL | Butler | 1013 | 1 | AL-013-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 20,947 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $6,000 |
| AL | Butler | 1013 | 2 | AL-013-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 20,947 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $6,000 |
| AL | Butler | 1013 | 3 | AL-013-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 20,947 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $2,000 |
| AL | Chambers | 1017 | 2 | AL-017-2 | 50.5 | 8 | 34,215 | Yes | 50 | $5,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Cherokee | 1019 | 1 | AL-019-1 | 49.5 | 8 | 25,989 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $7,000 |
| AL | Cherokee | 1019 | 2 | AL-019-2 | 50.5 | 8 | 25,989 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $7,000 |
| AL | Cherokee | 1019 | 3 | AL-019-3 | 16.5 | 8 | 25,989 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $2,000 |
| AL | Chilton | 1021 | 1 | AL-021-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 43,643 | Yes | 60 | $6,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Chilton | 1021 | 2 | AL-021-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 43,643 | Yes | 60 | $6,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Chilton | 1021 | 3 | AL-021-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 43,643 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Choctaw | 1023 | 1 | AL-023-1 | 49.5 | 26 | 13,859 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Choctaw | 1023 | 2 | AL-023-2 | 50.5 | 26 | 13,859 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Choctaw | 1023 | 3 | AL-023-3 | 16.5 | 26 | 13,859 | Yes | 6 | $600 | $1,000 |
| AL | Clarke | 1025 | 1 | AL-025-1 | 49.5 | 27 | 25,833 | No | 30 | $3,000 | $7,000 |
| AL | Clarke | 1025 | 2 | AL-025-2 | 50.5 | 27 | 25,833 | No | 30 | $3,000 | $7,000 |
| AL | Clarke | 1025 | 3 | AL-025-3 | 16.5 | 27 | 25,833 | No | 10 | $1,000 | $2,000 |
| AL | Clay | 1027 | 1 | AL-027-1 | 49.5 | 8 | 13,932 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Clay | 1027 | 2 | AL-027-2 | 50.5 | 8 | 13,932 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Clay | 1027 | 3 | AL-027-3 | 16.5 | 8 | 13,932 | Yes | 6 | $600 | $1,000 |
| AL | Cleburne | 1029 | 2 | AL-029-2 | 50.5 | 8 | 14,972 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Coffee | 1031 | 1 | AL-031-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 49,948 | Yes | 70 | $7,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Coffee | 1031 | 2 | AL-031-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 49,948 | Yes | 70 | $7,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Coffee | 1031 | 3 | AL-031-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 49,948 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Conecuh | 1035 | 1 | AL-035-1 | 49.5 | 27 | 13,228 | No | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Conecuh | 1035 | 2 | AL-035-2 | 50.5 | 27 | 13,228 | No | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Conecuh | 1035 | 3 | AL-035-3 | 16.5 | 27 | 13,228 | No | 6 | $600 | $1,000 |
| AL | Coosa | 1037 | 1 | AL-037-1 | 49.5 | 8 | 11,539 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Coosa | 1037 | 2 | AL-037-2 | 50.5 | 8 | 11,539 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Coosa | 1037 | 3 | AL-037-3 | 16.5 | 8 | 11,539 | Yes | 5 | $500 | $1,000 |
| AL | Covington | 1039 | 1 | AL-039-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 37,765 | Yes | 50 | $5,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Covington | 1039 | 2 | AL-039-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 37,765 | Yes | 50 | $5,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Covington | 1039 | 3 | AL-039-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 37,765 | Yes | 10 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
| AL | Crenshaw | 1041 | 1 | AL-041-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 13,906 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Crenshaw | 1041 | 2 | AL-041-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 13,906 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Crenshaw | 1041 | 3 | AL-041-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 13,906 | Yes | 6 | $600 | $1,000 |
| AL | Cullman | 1043 | 1 | AL-043-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 80,406 | Yes | 100 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
| AL | Cullman | 1043 | 2 | AL-043-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 80,406 | Yes | 100 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
| AL | Cullman | 1043 | 3 | AL-043-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 80,406 | Yes | 30 | $3,000 | $7,000 |
| AL | Dale | 1045 | 1 | AL-045-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 50,251 | Yes | 70 | $7,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Dale | 1045 | 2 | AL-045-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 50,251 | Yes | 70 | $7,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Dale | 1045 | 3 | AL-045-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 50,251 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| AL | Dallas | 1047 | 1 | AL-047-1 | 49.5 | 24 | 43,820 | Yes | 60 | $6,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Dallas | 1047 | 2 | AL-047-2 | 50.5 | 24 | 43,820 | Yes | 60 | $6,000 | $10,000 |
| AL | Dallas | 1047 | 3 | AL-047-3 | 16.5 | 24 | 43,820 | Yes | 20 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
Today, the FCC ruled that Dish should not have received small company discounts for their bidding partners in the AWS-3 auction, meaning that Dish would need to pay full price for the spectrum licenses won by Northstar and SNR or they would need to return the spectrum to the FCC for a re-auction.
Below is a map that reflects the AWS-3 spectrum that would be available at auction if Dish declines to pay the full auction price.
The next questions will focus on who could benefit most from this spectrum. In the image below from our Spectrum Ownership Grid, the AWS-3 ownership for the Top 3 US markets are shown. The columns filled with "FCC" indicate the spectrum that would be re-auctioned, so there would be a 5x5 channel in the New York EA (Economic Area Market) and a 10x10 channel in the Chicago market between the Chicago CMA (G channel) and the Chicago EA (H channel). It is work noting that AT&T already has a strong position in these markets, but Verizon lacks AWS-3 spectrum in each of these markets, although no AWS-3 spectrum is available in the Los Angeles market.
In August, we had blog post that discussed the counties that are on the EBS band plan and the way that the EBS license areas were determined. In this post we are going to examine how to use our EBS Whitespace Auction Opportunities Tool.
The EBS Whitespace Auction Opportunities Tool provides carriers, telephone companies, internet service providers (ISP), cable companies, investors, and financial analysts with the tools to evaluate the opportunities in this auction.
As we discussed before, this auction will provide the winner's access to 3 wide band channels in the EBS (2.5GHz) band. One channels is 49.5 MHz, one channel is 50.5 MHz, and one channel is a combined 17.5 MHz. In the images below, we indicate how each of the existing EBS channels (A1,A2,..) are component channels in the larger wide band EBS Auction channels.
EBS Auction Channel 1:
EBS Auction Channel 2:
EBS Auction Channel 3:
The population that a bidder can serve is determined by the unlicensed population for each of the component channels within each EBS auction channel.
Below is an example of two counties in West Virginia where 100% of the county population is available for each component channel in the EBS Auction Channel 1. In our EBS Whitespace Auction Opportunities Tool this is seen in the Spectrum Grid (% POPs) worksheet. The percentage of the available unlicensed population is divided by the full county population.
Population Percentage Worksheet:
The second worksheet in the EBS Whitespace Auction Opportunities Tool provides the discrete available unlicensed population for each component channel as well as total MHz-POPs for the entire EBS Auction Channel.
Population Worksheet:
Our next example is a Nevada county that has varying available whitespace population for each component channel. In the POPs view immediately below, the available whitespace population for EBS Auction Channel 1 varies from 2,024 for the A1 component channel to 43,872 for the B2 channel.
Population Worksheet:
In the % POPS view, the population comparison to the total county population is highlighted with Red to Green cell colors. For the A1 component channel, the 2,024 available whitespace POPs represents 4% of the Douglas county population while for the B2 component channel, the 43,872 available whitespace POPs represents 93% of the Douglas county population.
Population Percentage Worksheet:
Available Whitespace Area:
In addition to Population Analysis to each component channel, purchasers of the EBS Whitespace Auction Opportunity Tool also receive access to our EBS Whitespace Mapping module in our Web Spectrum Viewer. Selecting either the A1 component channel cell for POPS or for % POPs, the whitespace license area map for that component channel is displayed.
A1 Component Channel Whitespace Area:
For the B2 component channel the whitespace license area fills a majority of Douglas county reflecting the 92% population availability.
B2 Component Channel Whitespace Area:
The EBS Whitespace Auction Opportunities Tools is available either as a nationwide purchase (all 50 states and US territories) or a state by state purchase. The purchase will enable carriers and investors to evaluate their opportunity to add 2.5GHz spectrum in the targeted markets and it will allow investors to quantity the national or state opportunities for these new channels as well as provide an evaluation of the strength or weakness of the existing 2.5GHz licensee in each market.
The primary challenge in evaluating the EBS Whitespace auction opportunities, lies with the available licensing information provided by FCC. For each of the EBS licenses, the FCC provides a map for a 35 mile radius circle from the license centerpoint. Below is the FCC map for WHR463, an EBS A1 channel license in Los Angeles county. Not indicated in this map, is the overlap that this license has with two other A1 channel licenses in Los Angeles county.
WHR463:
In two images below, it is clear that a significant portion WHR463's 35 mile radius license area is shared with WHG227 and WND634.
WHG227:
WND634:
The FCC resolves these overlap issues through the creation of Geographic Service Areas (GSA) for each license_channel combination. The starting point is to look at all of the 35 mile overlaps on an individual channel basis, e.g. A1, A2, ...
Here is an example case with 5 licenses in a 4 county area.
The Geographic Service Areas are initially created by bisecting each of the overlapping areas (splitting the football) so each license has its own exclusive area.
The GSA's were formed based upon active licenses on a specific date. Licenses that were issued after this date (PSA6) do not claim any part of the overlap area with existing GSAs.
These GSA's are sometimes referred to as "Cookie Bite" GSAs.
After the GSA's were formed, any cancelled or terminated licenses lost their area, but none of that area is added to the GSAs that previously overlapped the cancelled/terminated licenses.
The map below represents the licensed spectrum in this 4 county area, prior to the EBS Whitespace Auction for a specific channel.
The final representation of the unlicensed (whitespace) area in each county that will be available in the auction is the area from the GSA boundary for each license to the county boundary.
Going back to Los Angeles County A1 channel example, you can see the WHG227, WHR463, and WND634 licenses in the center of the map reflecting each of their A1 Channel GSAs.
Our final map indicates the whitespace area for the A1 channel in Los Angeles county. Call signs WHG227 and WND634 were both cancelled after the GSA boundaries were computed, thus their license area is now part of the A1 channel EBS Whitespace, indicated in the orange cross hatch.
Source: FCC
Spektrum Metrics Insights & Analytics is pleased to announce that our Millimeter Wave - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool has been updated with the Auction 103 results and is available for purchase.
Below is a sample of the Spectrum Grid Analysis Module, highlighting the 37/39 GHz spectrum ownership for the New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago CMA markets.
The Millimeter Wave - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool contains 20 additional analysis modules including:
With our Web Spectrum Viewer subscription, maps for each carrier's total Millimeter Wave spectrum depth and their spectrum depth for each frequency band are available. Below is a map for the 47GHz spectrum that Sprint won in Auction 103.
Click here to contact Spektrum Metrics Insights & Analytics.
Last week, Verizon filed applications to acquire the 28GHz (LMDS) spectrum held by two additional companies; Sunshine LMDS and Virginia Tech Foundation. We are using our recently released, Web Spectrum Viewer - Mapping Module to illustrate the spectrum owned by each of these companies. As with Verizon's other recent 28GHz acquisitions these transactions involve the Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) spectrum that was owned prior to Auction 101. The first map below illustrates the license area for Sunshine LMDS. Verizon is only acquiring the L1 and L2 channel spectrum from Sunshine LMDS. The spectrum depths on the map indicate that Sunshine controls the L1/L2 channels (850MHz) and the remaining A block LMDS channels (300MHz). The county detail for Sunshine's spectrum is indicated in the second map.
Sunshine LMDS:
Sunshine LMDS - County Detail:
The second transaction involves Virginia Tech Foundation. In this transaction, Verizon is acquiring rights to both the L1/L2 channels as well as the remaining A block LMDS spectrum. In the county detail map, the counties where Virginia Tech only controls the L1/L2 channels are visible in light tan color, while the markets where they also control the remaining A block LMDS channels are in a dark tan. The FCC controls the remaining A block LMDS channels in the counties where Virginia Tech Foundation only controls the L1/L2 channels.
Virginia Tech Foundation:
Virginia Tech Foundation - County Detail:
In July, the FCC released their report and order for their plans to auction the white space 2.5 GHz spectrum. Using our Mobile Carrier - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool we have created a couple of images to illustrated the auction of the spectrum in a rural county and the auction of spectrum in a urban county.
Our rural example focuses on Wayne County, Iowa. Wayne County has a population of nearly 6,500.
In the image above, we indicate the primary spectrum ownership for each channel in Wayne, IA. Sprint is the spectrum owner for all of the BRS (Broadband Radio Service) channels and the FCC is the spectrum owner for all of the EBS (Educational Broadcast Service) channels. We have highlighted in the Bandwidth row, the different channels the FCC has defined for auction. The red highlights are for the 49.5MHz channel, the green highlights indicate the channels included in the 50.5MHz channel and the blue highlights indicate the channels included in 17.5MHz channel. The 17.5MHz channel consists of 3 x 5.5MHz contiguous channels and 3 x 0.33MHz guard band channels.
In the area below each channel we indicate in green, the available population that can be licensed for each channel as a percentage. Clearly, purchasing any of the 3 channels (49.5, 50.5, 17.5) at auction would provide a carrier with the ability to service 100% of the population with each of the component 2.5GHz channels.
Our urban example focuses on McHenry County, IL. McHenry County has a population of nearly 310,000. McHenry County is one of the 6 counties that constitute the Chicago CMA Market.
In the urban example, the carrier that purchases the red (49.5MHz) channel would be able build a network reaching 20% of the population with the A1, A2, and A3 channels (16.5MHz), they would be able to reach 80% of the population with the B1, B2, B3, and C3 channels, and they can reach the entire population with the C1 and C2 channels. The auction winning carrier will have to coordinate their operations for all but the C1 and C2 channels around the geographic license areas that Sprint already controls.
Today, the FCC released results for Auction 101 (28 GHz) and Auction 102 (24 GHz). These results are now posted in our Millimeter Wave - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool. The Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool provides 19 analysis modules to analyze each carrier's ownership in each of the millimeter wave bands. These modules include a spectrum ownership grid (below), seven different spectrum depth analysis modules, a MHz-POPs analysis module, and 3 licensed POPs analysis modules.
To summarize some of the auction results, we updated pie charts that were originally published in partnership with Fierce Wireless. These charts represent each carrier's MHz-POPs in terms of the country total.
24GHz:
28GHz;
39GHz:
As Auction 102 completes its 64th round today, I thought it would be a good time to share a map indicating the markets (PEA) where existing licensees already control spectrum prior to the start of the Auction 102. As you can see below, the FCC doesn't control 100MHz of the 24GHz spectrum in Reno (PEA076), Las Vegas (PEA026), and Phoenix (PEA015). The FCC also doesn't control 25MHz of spectrum in Albuquerque (PEA075). All of these licenses originally were controlled by M&M Brothers LLC and they track back to the original 40x40MHz channelization of the 24GHz band. M&M Brothers agreed to trade in their Casa Grande (PEA126), Saint George (PEA229), Gallup (PEA285), Socorro (PEA323), and Deming (PEA375) licenses for 100MHz licenses in the 3 yellow PEAs and a 25MHz license in the blue. Skyriver Spectrum & Technology now controls M&M Brothers licenses.
While the national map indicates the available spectrum depth on a PEA basis, our Spectrum Grid Analysis Module details the specific channels and counties that make up each of the PEA license assignments. In the Spectrum Grid, you can see complete ownership of channel 7 for all of the counties in PEA 15, 26, and 76; with on 25MHz in the two New Mexico counties.
On March 21st, the FCC released a Notice of Procedures describing how existing 39GHz spectrum ownership below will be remapped to the new 39GHz configuration. We thought it would be beneficial to see how the FCC arrived at their results.
Current Configuration:
Future Configuration:
The procedures the FCC announced will provide a route for the existing 39GHz owners to essentially trade-in their spectrum for vouchers that can be used in Auction 103. The FCC published a summary of the aggregated holdings data for each of the 39GHz licensees so we decided to use the data from our Millimeter Wave - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool to show the underlying calculations.
We are able to use the data from our Millimeter Wave - Spectrum Ownership Analysis Tool to determine the aggregate MHz-POPs value for PEA003 (Chicago). To find the aggregate MHz-POPs we must first find the MHz-POPs contribution for each of AT&T's licenses (call signs) in the Chicago market. Below are each of the county MHz-POPs components for each call sign. We have indicated whether the license covers the entire county or whether it is a partial license in the Full/Partial County column. The county MHz-POPs component is found by multiplying the bandwidth for each call sign by the county population. The total aggregate MHz-POPs is the sum of the county MHz-POPs for all of AT&T's licenses. Using this process, we have found AT&T's aggregate MHz-POPs to by 2,817,188,800 compared to the FCC's results of 2,815,434,000.
| Market | CallSign | Channel Block | Full/Partial County | State | County | Bandwidth | County Population | MHz-POPs |
| PEA003 | WRBI252 | 1A | Full | IL | Cook County | 50 | 5,194,675 | 259,733,750 |
| Chicago | DuPage County | 50 | 916,924 | 45,846,200 | ||||
| Grundy County | 50 | 50,063 | 2,503,150 | |||||
| Kane County | 50 | 515,269 | 25,763,450 | |||||
| Kankakee County | 50 | 113,449 | 5,672,450 | |||||
| Kendall County | 50 | 114,736 | 5,736,800 | |||||
| Lake County | 50 | 703,462 | 35,173,100 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 308,760 | 15,438,000 | |||||
| Will County | 50 | 677,560 | 33,878,000 | |||||
| IN | Lake County | 50 | 496,005 | 24,800,250 | ||||
| LaPorte County | 50 | 111,467 | 5,573,350 | |||||
| Porter County | 50 | 164,343 | 8,217,150 | |||||
| WRBI253 | 1B | Full | IL | Cook County | 50 | 5,194,675 | 259,733,750 | |
| DuPage County | 50 | 916,924 | 45,846,200 | |||||
| Grundy County | 50 | 50,063 | 2,503,150 | |||||
| Kane County | 50 | 515,269 | 25,763,450 | |||||
| Kankakee County | 50 | 113,449 | 5,672,450 | |||||
| Kendall County | 50 | 114,736 | 5,736,800 | |||||
| Lake County | 50 | 703,462 | 35,173,100 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 308,760 | 15,438,000 | |||||
| Will County | 50 | 677,560 | 33,878,000 | |||||
| IN | Lake County | 50 | 496,005 | 24,800,250 | ||||
| LaPorte County | 50 | 111,467 | 5,573,350 | |||||
| Porter County | 50 | 164,343 | 8,217,150 | |||||
| WRBI590 | 4A | Full | IL | Cook County | 50 | 5,194,675 | 259,733,750 | |
| DuPage County | 50 | 916,924 | 45,846,200 | |||||
| Grundy County | 50 | 50,063 | 2,503,150 | |||||
| Kane County | 50 | 515,269 | 25,763,450 | |||||
| Kankakee County | 50 | 113,449 | 5,672,450 | |||||
| Kendall County | 50 | 114,736 | 5,736,800 | |||||
| Lake County | 50 | 703,462 | 35,173,100 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 308,760 | 15,438,000 | |||||
| Will County | 50 | 677,560 | 33,878,000 | |||||
| IN | Lake County | 50 | 496,005 | 24,800,250 | ||||
| LaPorte County | 50 | 111,467 | 5,573,350 | |||||
| Porter County | 50 | 164,343 | 8,217,150 | |||||
| WRBI591 | 4B | Full | IL | Cook County | 50 | 5,194,675 | 259,733,750 | |
| DuPage County | 50 | 916,924 | 45,846,200 | |||||
| Grundy County | 50 | 50,063 | 2,503,150 | |||||
| Kane County | 50 | 515,269 | 25,763,450 | |||||
| Kankakee County | 50 | 113,449 | 5,672,450 | |||||
| Kendall County | 50 | 114,736 | 5,736,800 | |||||
| Lake County | 50 | 703,462 | 35,173,100 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 308,760 | 15,438,000 | |||||
| Will County | 50 | 677,560 | 33,878,000 | |||||
| IN | Lake County | 50 | 496,005 | 24,800,250 | ||||
| LaPorte County | 50 | 111,467 | 5,573,350 | |||||
| Porter County | 50 | 164,343 | 8,217,150 | |||||
| WRBJ298 | 8A | Full | IL | Cook County | 50 | 5,194,675 | 259,733,750 | |
| DuPage County | 50 | 916,924 | 45,846,200 | |||||
| Grundy County | 50 | 50,063 | 2,503,150 | |||||
| Kane County | 50 | 515,269 | 25,763,450 | |||||
| Kankakee County | 50 | 113,449 | 5,672,450 | |||||
| Kendall County | 50 | 114,736 | 5,736,800 | |||||
| Lake County | 50 | 703,462 | 35,173,100 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 308,760 | 15,438,000 | |||||
| Will County | 50 | 677,560 | 33,878,000 | |||||
| IN | Lake County | 50 | 496,005 | 24,800,250 | ||||
| LaPorte County | 50 | 111,467 | 5,573,350 | |||||
| Porter County | 50 | 164,343 | 8,217,150 | |||||
| WRBJ299 | 8B | Full | IL | Cook County | 50 | 5,194,675 | 259,733,750 | |
| DuPage County | 50 | 916,924 | 45,846,200 | |||||
| Grundy County | 50 | 50,063 | 2,503,150 | |||||
| Kane County | 50 | 515,269 | 25,763,450 | |||||
| Kankakee County | 50 | 113,449 | 5,672,450 | |||||
| Kendall County | 50 | 114,736 | 5,736,800 | |||||
| Lake County | 50 | 703,462 | 35,173,100 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 308,760 | 15,438,000 | |||||
| Will County | 50 | 677,560 | 33,878,000 | |||||
| IN | Lake County | 50 | 496,005 | 24,800,250 | ||||
| LaPorte County | 50 | 111,467 | 5,573,350 | |||||
| Porter County | 50 | 164,343 | 8,217,150 | |||||
| WRBK275 | 13A | Partial | IL | Kane County | 50 | 21,235 | 1,061,750 | |
| Kendall County | 50 | 13,076 | 653,800 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 37,438 | 1,871,900 | |||||
| 13B | Partial | IL | Kane County | 50 | 21,235 | 1,061,750 | ||
| Kendall County | 50 | 13,076 | 653,800 | |||||
| McHenry County | 50 | 37,438 | 1,871,900 | |||||
| 2,817,188,800 |
The Market MHz-POPs value is found by multiplying the new 39GHz channel size (100MHz) by the total population of the Chicago PEA.
| Market | Bandwidth | PEA Population | Market MHz-POPs |
| PEA003 (Chicago) | 100 | 9,366,713 | 936,671,300 |
The next calculation provides the number of blocks that AT&T is authorized to receive in the 39GHz auction by relinquishing their current licenses. Our analysis indicates that AT&T will start with slightly more than 3 - 100MHz channel blocks in Chicago before the auction starts.
| Market | Aggregate MHz-POPs | Market MHz-POPs | Channel Blocks |
| PEA003 (Chicago) | 2,817,188,800 | 936,671,300 | 3.00766 |
